CLASS OF 2016 BELK SCHOLARS

BELK SENIORS 2016
Class of 2016 Belk Scholars

Meet the Class of 2016 Belk Scholars!

Front Row: Catherine Wu, Matt Gore, Elizabeth Welliver

Back Row: Kyle Taylor, Dylan Goodman, Bolton Smith, Matthew Schlerf, Emily Rapport

Having left their indelible mark on this community, these Scholars have launched into the world to continue to be the leaders and change agents  that mark them — mark all of you — as Belk Scholars.

DYLAN GOODMAN  – moving to Boston in August to begin a year-long Jewish fellowship with JOIN, a group which aims to nurture Jewish leaders in social justice and community organizing.     

MATTHEW GORE working in Dallas as an associate with the Boston Consulting Group.

EMILY RAPPORTdoing software development and design for McMaster-Carr Supply Company in Chicago, Illinois.

MATTHEW SCHLERFhaving won Davidson’s  W. Thomas Smith Scholarship, will be pursuing a MA in Ensemble Theatre at Rose Bruford College of Theatre and Performance in London.

BOLTON SMITH attending Georgetown University Walsh School of Foreign Service to pursue a Masters of German and European Studies

KYLE TAYLOR – working at Pew Research Center in their Religion and Public Life Department, analyzing data on how religious affiliation and gender relate to educational attainment around the world.

ELIZABETH WELLIVERworking as a Fellow in the Chaplain’s Office focusing on interfaith engagement and education at Davidson.

CATHERINE WUworking at Cigna in the Managed Care Rotational Program. I will be working in three different departments in Houston next year, learning about Medicaid and public health.

 

 

 

 

 

Elizabeth Welliver ’16 — Working toward a peaceable and just world

June 29, 2016 by Savannah Haeger ’16

In a world increasingly dominated by selfies and cell phone screens, Elizabeth Welliver ’16 is known at Davidson and beyond for her ability to connect and reflect with others in the here and now.

The recent graduate, a religion major and Belk Scholar from Westminster, Maryland, spent her high school years at the international and peace-focused Pearson United World College in Canada, cultivating a strong awareness of the intercultural and interfaith dialogue that defined much of her Davidson experience. Once at Davidson, she continued this work as a leader of the Better Together Interfaith group, joining the group her very first week on campus.

Welliver’s time at Davidson led her to a newfound passion, as well: Latin America.

“I came in knowing nothing about Latin America until I went to El Salvador with the Chaplain’s Office on a spring break trip as a first-year,” said Welliver. “It was an awakening experience, and I saw how Christianity played a unique role in the Global South.” Following that trip, Welliver decided to start Spanish courses at Davidson and has since visited Guatemala, spent a semester abroad on the Davidson in Peru program, and most recently, traveled to Colombia. She also made trips to Spain and France on an interfaith trip and a Chaplain’s Office trip, respectively. Her passion for international experiences led to her selection as one of four Davidson Class of 2016 finalists for the prestigious Watson Fellowship.

Adding to her already extensive travels, Welliver spent last summer in Tucson, Arizona, at Southside Presbyterian Church, participating in a Ministry Fellowship with the Rev. Alison Harrington, a well-known leader in the sanctuary movement and immigration reform.

“From Rev. Harrington, I learned not only how to pray, preach and read the Word, but also how to lead people trying to fight the broken immigration system, working with them to maintain hope and faith,” she said. “I didn’t realize that la lucha was so embedded within the Church community.”

With this same level of introspection and reflection, Welliver fostered a space for students and faculty alike to practice mindfulness, guiding members of the Mindfulness Club through poetry readings, meditation and conversation.

“We often forget how valuable it is to sit and breathe with each other,” said Welliver, a poet herself.

Continuing Education

Welliver envisions a future that includes continued work with interfaith ministry and helping others along their respective spiritual journeys. Reflective of her intention to pursue such a career, Welliver received the Charles Malone Richards Award at Spring Convocation in 2015, awarded to a rising senior preparing for the ministry.

This upcoming academic year, she will serve as a fellow in the Chaplain’s Office, working to engage students, faculty, and staff with interfaith learning and religious literacy.

“I am excited to serve as a small part in Davidson’s work to engage students of all secular and faith-based identities in preparing for lives of leadership and service,” said Welliver.

After her year with the Chaplain’s Office, Welliver intends to continue serving the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) as a mission worker for social justice, hoping to work on the U.S./Mexico border and in Latin America. Additionally, she plans to attend seminary and eventually return to a college or university as a chaplain herself.

“Religion is tied to all social issues of our time, and can show us the way through crises,” she said. “I have grown spiritually while at Davidson, and am grateful to the community here that has prepared me to seek a more peaceable and just world.”

 

Misadventures Magazine: Belk Scholar Alumna Zoe Balaconis ’11

After years of being frustrated by the outdoors-industry publications being dominated by males, Davidson graduate of 2011 and Belk Scholar Alumna Zoe Balaconis founded Misadventures in November of 2013. It’s mission? To bring quality outdoor and adventure content about women to an overlooked but hungry audience. Currently sitting as the Senior Editor, Zoe lives in Somerville, Massachusetts where most of the time she wishes she could be relaxing on a boat. Be on the lookout for Misadventures which hits the stands this month, December 2015!

To learn more about Misadventures check out their website: Misadventures Magazine

151c925d-f78b-4145-91a9-e0d791008c37.jpg

Better Together: Belk Scholar Sana Alimohamed ’17 and McGaw Scholar Ela Hefler ’17

­

July, 2015 by John Syme

In high school, some of Sana Alimohamed’s classmates were concerned for her salvation, and told her so.

“Sana,” they said to their friend, who is of Shia Muslim background by way of Tanzania, Pakistan and England, “we like you. We don’t want you to go to Hell!”

She came to Davidson instead, a Belk Scholar, and has put her open intellect and centered spirit to work as a co-leader of Davidson’s student group Better Together.

Better Together brings students from all religions and philosophical traditions together to learn from each other through conversations, festivals, lectures and visits to houses of worship.

“For me, religion is one medium in which you can make sense of a world that is predominantly chaos,” said Alimohamed ’17.

Better Together co-leader Ela Hefler ’17 agrees.

Alimohamed and Hefler
r-l Ela Hefler ’17 and Sana Alimohamed ’17

“The ecumenism of Davidson was a very accessible way for me to understand what faith can mean,” Hefler, a McGaw Scholar originally from Toronto, recalled of her arrival at Davidson from Canada. There, she had attended United World Colleges Pearson College, a two-year, pre-university school in British Columbia with up to 200 students from more than 100 countries.

Because of the wide variety of particular religious traditions in such a group, Hefler recalls, there was often reluctance to discuss beliefs and spiritual practices too openly, for fear of giving offense.

Better Together addresses just that tendency, bringing clear intention to developing communication skills around religious discussion.

Better Together’s signature event is Plates of Faith, a formal yet relaxed and safe event for conversation over a meal with fellow Davidson students, faculty and staff.

Participants agree to assume the best of intentions in others’ contributions; by extension, any potential offense given or taken is assumed to spring from benign ignorance, lack of knowing.

Coming to terms with that lack of knowing is the work at hand.

“It’s not about coming to agreement on exactly what is ‘the truth,'” said Hefler.

Rather, it’s about direct experiences and the narratives they create.

“It’s not about world peace,” Hefler said. “It’s about saying we’re going to have these conversations even if we don’t fix anything beyond better individual understanding. I think the act of struggling with that betters the world.

“Doing interfaith work not only creates spaces for a lot of students to ask questions and learn and know each other better,” she said, “but it also calls on a set of skills that is more and more useful in the world today.”

“We try,” said Alimohamed, “to find common ground, but keep the mosaic rather than a melting pot.”

Particularity in Pluralism

Honoring the mosaic of human spiritual experience at Davidson grows naturally out of the college’s Christian heritage in the Reformed tradition, says College Chaplain Rob Spach ’84.

He cites the college’s statement of purpose often:

“The Christian tradition to which Davidson remains committed recognizes God as the source of all truth, and believes that Jesus Christ is the revelation of that God, a God bound by no church or creed. The loyalty of the college thus extends beyond the Christian community to the whole of humanity and necessarily includes openness to and respect for the world’s various religious traditions. Davidson dedicates itself to the quest for truth and encourages teachers and students to explore the whole of reality, whether physical or spiritual, with unlimited employment of their intellectual powers. At Davidson, faith and reason work together in mutual respect and benefit toward growth in learning, understanding, and wisdom.”

He sees it every day.

“The range of religious traditions and worldviews that our students bring to campus enriches the community and enhances their education, since the world in which they will lead and serve is pluralistic,” said Spach. “Better Together is helping all of us go deeper into our own particularity as well as learning about the beliefs and practices of people we come to know as friends in the classroom, on stage, on the athletic field, and so on. Stereotypes get shattered, and our common humanity affirmed in ways that bless us and draw us toward being a blessing to others.”

Such a living, breathing, growing relationship to the world depends, said Alimohamed, on continuous seeking.

“I am my own greatest puzzle, but the world itself is a ginormous puzzle,” she said. “I don’t consider myself religious, but I am a wanderer and a ponderer.”

You can learn more about Religious & Spiritual Life at Davidson and read “The Oasis: Particularity of Time and Space” in the Davidson Journal.

THREE CLASS OF 2015 BELKS NAMED FULBRIGHT SCHOLARS!

Kaki Bennett, an Atlanta native, is a biology major with a minor in French and Kaki Bennettfrancophone studies. She will spend her Fulbright year working with Guy Berchem at the Luxembourg Institute of Health, researching less-invasive biopsy techniques for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. At Davidson, Belk Scholar Bennett has been researching the effects of electronic cigarette vapor on rat lung cells.

“I am looking forward to combining my love of French and biology while learning more about the beautiful country and people of Luxembourg,” she said.

Bennett also sings in the Davidson College Chorale, serves as volunteer coordinator for the Free Clinic of Our Towns, and studied abroad in France.

Mustafa Abid will use his Fulbright research grant to extend research heMustafa Abid began last summer in Jordan, analyzing how the influx of Syrian refugees impacts the quality of access to medical care for non-Syrian r
efugees. Specifically, he’ll use patient exit interviews to better understand how patients select NGO clinics and ways capacity building interventions can streamline information and patient referrals.

“Life in Amman centers on the relationships you build,” Abid said. “I can’t wait to get back and re-kindle relationships from last summer and build new ones. And, of course, I can’t wait to be reunited with my favorite cafés and the food they serve.”

Abid, a Belk Scholar, is a political science major with a minor in Arab Studies. Following his Fulbright year, he will attend Wake Forest University School of Medicine.

          Jessie Li received a Fulbright ETA and will travel to Taiwan to teach, continuing and Jessie Li          deepening her work in education in Asia.

“My interest in education stems from my                      passions for teaching and for the English                    language,” she said. “I’ve taught through                      Breakthrough Collaborative and other                          programs in Hong Kong and China, and I’m                excited to expand and deepen my teaching                experience in Asia through the Fulbright in                  Taiwan.”

A native of State College, Pa., Li is a Belk                    Scholar and English major who loves writing              and journalism. She wrote a novella for her English honors thesis, received the                    Patricia Cornwell Creative Writing Scholarship and served as founder and editor-in-            chief of Her Campus Davidson, an online women’s magazine.

The Fulbright Program operates in more than 155 countries worldwide and has provided approximately 325,000 participants with the opportunity to study, teach or conduct research abroad. Approximately 8,000 grants are awarded annually.

The program was established by the U.S. Congress in 1946 under legislation introduced by the late Senator J. William Fulbright of Arkansas. It is sponsored by the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, which works with private non-profit organizations in the United States and with U.S. embassies and binational Fulbright commissions abroad to administer the program.

YEEVA CHENG ’15 AWARDED 2015 WATSON FELLOWSHIP

April 8, 2015 by Robert Abare ’13

Yeeva Cheng, a senior anthropology major and Belk Scholar from Cherryville, N.C., was recently awarded a Watson Fellowship to study marriage practices among the Hakka people, a Chinese ethnic group with diaspora living across the globe.YeevaChang_250px

The Watson Fellowship is awarded through the Thomas J. Watson Foundation, and provides a grant for independent study and travel outside the United States to graduating college seniors nominated by participating institutions. It offers college graduates “of unusual promise” a year of independent exploration in international settings to enhance their capacity for resourcefulness, imagination, openness and leadership. Each fellow receives a $28,000 stipend.

Cheng is a Hakka woman herself, and grew up in a family that practiced arranged marriage. She explained how her upbringing led her to observe how marriage practices affect women’s expectations for themselves.  “When I was younger, I didn’t see many women attend college, and certainly not colleges away from home,” she explained. “Women who grow up in the culture of arranged marriages might lose confidence in themselves or not perform well in school because they know that their futures are already determined. On the other hand, this doesn’t mean women aren’t expressing their agency or empowerment in other profound ways.”

Cheng said the primary purpose of her Watson Fellowship is to gain understanding about this cultural practice by meeting, interviewing and living with Hakka people in several cities around the globe-Kingston, Jamaica; Singkawang, Indonesia; Hamburg, Germany; and Port Louis, Mauritius.

She emphasized that she plans to observe and analyze rather than advocate for marriage choice in Hakka culture. “I’m not going on a mission to change peoples’ minds about arranged marriages,” she said. “My goal is to understand how people live with arranged marriages and cope with them.”

Following her year as a Watson Fellow, Cheng hopes to pursue a doctoral degree in anthropology. “I know an anthropologist’s life is not easy,” she said. “You must constantly travel and await grant funds, but I’m excited to pursue it.”

As a Davidson student, Cheng was primarily involved in a group called the Quest Scholars Network, which advocates for the interests of low-income students. “The Quest Scholars Network is a fairly new organization,” Cheng explained. “I think it reflects the need for a campus culture change in how we accommodate students who are from different socioeconomic backgrounds.” Cheng’s mentorship within the group inspired the network-building that she hopes to share among the women she will meet over the next year.

Cheng said her Davidson education has prepared her to encounter a variety of cultures and situations during her Watson Fellowship. “Different facets of my identity-as a first-generation college student, as a woman of color, as a kid who grew up working in a family restaurant-have made it challenging to thrive here,” she said. “But that’s a reality that I will have to face everywhere I go. My professors and friends at Davidson have taught me how to embrace my identity rather than be ashamed of it.”

Cheng said that Davidson taught her the bravery required for cultural interaction. She said, “The biggest lesson I’ve learned about encountering other cultures while at Davidson is that if I want to explore another culture, it’s up to me. I have to take the initiative, because no one else will mediate that experience for me. ”

‘COLORWORTHY’ DEEMED WORTHY OF $25K VENTURE FUND INVESTMENT

March 5, 2015 by Christina Ritchie Rogers ’03

Another budding company got a major infusion of support Friday, thanks to Davidson’s Venture Fund. The fund supports the college’s Entrepreneurship Initiative by awarding young alumni with investment capital of up to $25,000 in support of their entrepreneurial ventures.

Darrell Scott ’10 and Tareq Alani ’10 (R-L in picture: preparing for their pitch) received the full $25,000 available for their venture, ColorWorthy, a daily email digest for black millennials that curates and distributes relevant, compelling, national news content as well as some local news and events.

Scott_Alani_1_350px

“Print publications have declined, and new media has filled voids for various demographics, but no one has done that-at scale-for black millennials,” Alani said. “There’s this gaping void.”

Winning the Venture Fund not only gives the team needed seed money, it also gives them reassurance, knowing that other seasoned entrepreneurs have vetted their idea and believe it has promise.

“It feels really good to get this kind of validation,” Alani said. “We’ve put a lot of energy and time into the project so far, and seeing that pay off and knowing that we’re on the right track is awesome.”

The Venture Fund is made possible through a 2013 gift from the Nisbet family. Each year the college calls for idea submissions from current students and young alumni (up to five years out), and selects finalists who get matched with Davidson alumni mentors, meet with Davidson’s entrepreneur in residence, and prepare for the final presentation day in which they pitch their ideas to a panel of judges and compete for the ultimate award. This year there were six finalist teams.

To qualify for the money, the start-ups have to have for-profit business models, and have to be incorporated. They may choose to receive the money as either a convertible note or a warrant.

Alani and Scott will use the money to build out their technology and database infrastructure for the company, Scott said.

CALLING ALL PROBLEM SOLVERS

As owners, each brings to the table years of relevant experience and applicable skills. Alani has worked at the intersection of social justice and data analysis for the last five years, creating technical solutions for two large nonprofits and also curating content for 18 Million Rising, an Asian American Pacific Islander civic engagement group. Scott worked for the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation in Winston-Salem for two years on social justice grants and its nonprofit internship program, as well as its racial equity capacity building team, and then in 2012 he took a position with Accelerate Change in Washington, D.C., an organization working to advance social change through development of sustainable funding models. He works primarily with organizations whose members are domestic workers, immigrants, restaurant workers and progressive activists.

“It feels great to get this vote of confidence from the college and a community of entrepreneurs,” Scott said. “We’re looking forward to pushing more on the idea as well as staying in contact with the judges.”

The judges for the event were: College President Carol Quillen, as well as three accomplished entrepreneurs, Executive Chairman of Acta Consulting Mark McDowell, Partner at Grotech Ventures Don Rainey, and Co-founder/Chief Technology Officer of Versame Chris Boggiano.

In judging pitches, Boggiano considers both the products/ideas and the teams, but places more weight on the latter, he said. “I’m looking for problem solvers, critical thinkers. Will they take no for an answer, or will they keep trying?”

Scott attributes much of his confidence, perseverance and don’t-take-no attitude to his experience at Davidson. A Belk Scholar, Scott was a sociology major with a concentration in ethnic studies, and took great interest not just in identifying the causes of problems, but in understanding them and working to affect change through communication and civic engagement.

“Davidson gave me the space and the resources to explore those interests,” Scott said.

For his commitment to public service, Scott also received the Harry S. Truman Scholarship in 2009.

“My studies and experience at Davidson impact the way I approach my work with diverse groups, and give me a framework for understanding their challenges,” he said.

The idea for ColorWorthy was first incubated at Accelerate Change in 2013. Initially, they sought to aggregate information from African-American interest groups within Facebook, Scott explained, and examine the sort of content the users shared, promoted, and sought. They found:

  • There was great content, but it wasn’t packaged well
  • Many existing Facebook groups’ pages focused on local news, but people really want more national content
  • Images and videos “go bonkers” on Facebook
  • There was an obvious void of this sort of content in existing email newsletter models

“Ultimately, we want to re-create a news atmosphere like the one during the civil rights movement,” Scott said, “when there were several dozen black publications with circulations to hundreds of thousands of readers.”

“We’re using the same strategy that these black publications took, but with 21st century tools and tactics,” Alani said.

ColorWorthy stood out to Boggiano because of its aim to fill an obvious hole in the marketplace, he said, and also because of the team behind it.

“Darrell and Tareq in particular were both highly motivated and had a firm understanding of the space they’re venturing into. They had the best combination of idea and team to execute on that idea of all of the teams I saw pitch.”

And though there was only one winner, the exercises in innovation, idea development, research, workshopping and pitch presentation are invaluable for all of the participants, Boggiano said.

“Exposure to the idea of entrepreneurship is really the big win from all of this,” he said. “We need people in the world who are willing to challenge the status quo.”

Reconciling Tradition with Reality — International Relations Journal Article by Mustafa Abid ’15

Zaatari

RECONCILING TRADITION WITH REALITY: JORDAN AND THE NEW UNHRC REFUGEE CAMP POLICY

By Mustafa Abid

By the end of 2014, the UNHCR expects there to be over 1.4 million Syrian refugees in Jordan. The addition of 1.4 million new persons, despite attempts by international agencies to balance their arrival with increased aid, put tremendous strain on Jordan. Any Jordanian or Palestinian will immediately tell you about the difficulties of finding low wage work when Syrian refugees, wage-vulnerable, will snap up all cheap labor through extra low wages. Any Jordanian or Palestinian will tell you of the interminable wait-times plaguing Ministry of Health hospitals like Al-Bashir, where some patients wait as long as four months for treatment.

Yet no consensus currently exists regarding how these waves of refugees should be accommodated. By U.N. admission, along withmany others, the current solution of refugee camps simply doesn’t produce adequate results. A recent U.N. report notes that “UNHCR ’s experience has been that camps can have significant negative impacts over the longer term for all concerned”, and proceeds to list the dangers posed to camp residents due to criminality and violence in the camps, as well as the dependency camps create. This dependency on aid could incentivize refugees to stay in host nation camps instead of pursuing repatriation, and risks the entire premise on which refugee interventions are based: the eventual return of refugees to their homes.

The poor conditions of the camps have precipitated a movement of refugees out of the camps, and into urbanized settings, but in the process encounter other risks. Globally, only 1/3 of refugeesactually live in refugee camps, while the remainder reside in host nation urban centers. This applies to Jordan, directly: of 1.4 million refugees, in Jordan the U.N. considers over 600,000 to be ‘at risk’, and 83% of this ‘at risk’ population are urbanized refugees. The Jordanian government simply cannot keep up with the impact this informal population shift is having, nor can Jordanians themselves, as evidenced by the numerous price and service availability issues plaguing the Kingdom. Jordan needs a policy that addresses this urbanization with tangible responses. Whether in Jordan or across the world, refugees increasingly choose to settle in an urban environment, instead of camps, and this trend fuels the above-mentioned social impacts, and brings into question the efficacy of the traditional reliance on a camp-based model for refugee response.

In response to these changing realities, the U.N. announced and detailed a complete re-envisioning of its approach to refugee crises. The announcement comes after years of articles, research andpolicy memos from both the U.N. and outside observers that recognized, urged and demonstrated the efficacy of non-camp refugee solutions, even as others cautioned against too swiftly pursuing the approach. A field once sorely under-researched, refugee economics and resilience receives increasing attention, and has since the early 2000’s. With qualitative and quantitative data in hand, experts both for and against self-reliance policies for refugees have been able to make their case.

A variety of different papers and articles have argued over the years for the necessity of more effective assistance models, arguing that the benefits of reducing aid and instead facilitating the economic empowerment of refugees would be immense. Uganda, the center of a major effort to legalize refugee work and movement, became the source of contemporary research that may have spurred on the U.N. policy shift. Papers like Refugee Economies, Rethinking Popular Assumptions, by Alexander Betts et. Al, may have played an extremely influential role in the UN’s decision. The authors argue, through qualitative interviews of over 1500 households in Uganda, against five myths of refugee economics, namely that refugees are isolate, burden the economy, homogenous economically, technologically illiterate and dependent. They claim that instead of endangering host nations, the de-camping of refugee influxes could provide human capital, new markets and new producers to host economies. Their research indicates that often, refugees desire financial resources more than tangible aid items, because the financial resources give them the freedom to acquire what they need and invest in business opportunities; it comes as no surprise then that massive illicit markets for refugee aid supplies sprung up as refugees across the world sought to liquidize U.N. provided assets to create their own investment capital. Betts et. Al argue that the most efficacious solution to protracted refugee crises is not to build a new camp, but to utilize existing economic and social service structures as a framework, targeting refugee aid as development money and expertise for the entire country to help integrate refugees into the economy. This would include more financial aid to refugees and a reduction in tangible materials aid. Their belief is that through such market-driven aid, sustainable improvements to refugee economic agency can be achieved. Reflecting on the situation in Jordan, when significant investment has already been dedicated to the creation of camps like Zaatari, a strategy that utilizes this investment and the infrastructure it created by incentivizing the population to remain in the local could help reduce strain on native urban infrastructure. For such a camp-to-city policy to be effective though, future camps in refugee host nations would need to be placed in areas capable of supporting a population, with access to water and other basic resources.

In many ways, Betts’s argument rings true with the situation at hand. With so many refugees already urbanizing, despite the presence of camps, U.N. policy does need to shift in a direction that recognizes and attempts to work within the framework of this reality, as opposed to working around or against it. Unfortunately, no one solution could provide such clean results. In an article from 2006, long before the Syrian crises erupted, researchers took issue with the wholesale endorsement of self-reliance policy, and warned that it did not provide a silver-bullet to the protracted refugee crises. They based this warning off of research findings demonstrating that self reliance efforts do not take into account current social and political power structures, and how these power structures would constrain refugees from actually achieving economic agency. Instead, they would see a diminishment of U.N. aid as the expectancy for self-reliance increased, and a decrease in overall resources as they remained unable to fill that resource gap with self-earned income due to social and political constraints. The author warns that as a result, aggressive self-reliance policies may result in greater suffering for refugees. The U.N. data already points to a refugee population in Jordan that relies heavily on NGO and government aid for daily needs. Transitioning refugees off of this aid structure would require a commitment to job creation and support, especially when considering the persistent physical and mental medical needs impeding many refugees from full-time work.

In addition to the potential risk these policy solutions may actually pose to refugees, they do not speak to their impact on host-nations by moving refugees out of camp infrastructure and into host infrastructure. In a camp environment, education and healthcare services can be carefully planned and administrated based on the needs of the refugees. In contrast, attempting to access native healthcare and education resources, each public infrastructure center will need to re-evaluate its operation to meet refugee needs, and will need to cope with the direct competition between refugees and natives for services. If resources from camps were re-directed to the highest need urban centers, some of these gaps could be plugged, but the loss of organizational ability, in getting to set up a novel healthcare or education system to meet refugee needs, instead of attempting to alter or maximize existing ones, stands as a serious drawback to an urbanized approach to refugee systems.

Considering the policy impacts on the Jordanian refugee situation requires great hesitation. First and foremost, it is unlikely that the Jordanian government will implement many, if any of the tenants of this new U.N. policy, considering its commitment to building refugee camps like Zaatari far away from the metropolis of Amman. Yet, in light of the high percentage of refugees residing in urban areas, perhaps Amman will look to its history, in which the eventual economic incorporation of Palestinian refugees created a new, productive pool of human capital, and wonder if the same should not be done for the Syrians.

A second alternative exists, as a hybrid between self reliance and camp assistance, an alternative Jordan (unintentionally) also has experience with: turn the current refugee camps into their own cities. A perfect example of this is the Baqa’a refugee camp just outside of Amman. Originally built in 1967 to meet the needs of over 26,000 Palestinian refugees, tents were quickly replaced by prefabbed shelters to cope with the Jordanian winter, and slowly residents began modifying and improving these shelters, turning Baqa’a into a city. A drive through Baqa’a demonstrates this reality, with commerce and residential life proceeding like many developing world cities. Unfortunately, the organic transformation of the camp into a city provided few windows for NGO or government intervention to build adequate infrastructure or services to maintain the area, which now struggles with numerous growing-paints issues.

Following this model, Jordan could allow the U.N. and other relief organizations to keep managing the camps, but legalize work in them, and start laying down permanent elements to the city. By legalizing a free market economy, the government may help to reduce the vast crime networks that are currently preying on supplies the U.N. is providing to the camps. The U.N. would need to create incentives to keep refugees in Zaatari and out of Amman, Irbid and other cities, but if done carefully, could turn these camps into economic hubs instead of vacuums of international charity money that could instead be used for economic development. Alternatively, urbanization of existing camps, if handled poorly, could produce another Baqa’a, facing falling education and public services quality, quickly becoming a poverty trap for its residents.

Image Source: Daily Mail UK

A Huffington Post Pioneer for Change – Katie Belk Morris

Posted: 09/30/2014 11:56 am EDT Updated: 09/30/2014 11:59 am EDT

By: Katie Belk Morris

2014-09-25-Katiebelkfoundation.jpeg

Is change always about tearing down what’s wrong?

A few years ago when I was asked that question, I immediately answered, YES. I thought that change was moving from the bad to what is right or good.

Today, I disagree. Now I believe that change is about building upon the good. It is about identifying what is already working to create something even better. Through serving as the chair of our family foundation, I have found that change is realizing that in order to affect the very complex social issues of our day, we can’t be satisfied with “just okay.”

Endowed grantmaking foundations are an interesting lot. We have virtually no competitors or market forces pushing us to be better. The drive for improvement must come from within. For us at The Belk Foundation, that journey started with some seemingly simple, yet eye-opening questions. After over 80 years as a foundation with a broad mission, we finally asked ourselves: “What has been our legacy as a foundation to date? Our measurable impact so far? What has changed in the world as a result of our grants?”

No one liked the answer we found. We didn’t really know what our impact was. Since 1928, the foundation had spent more than $60 million to support organizations doing important work in our community. But when we looked across our somewhat scattered investments, we weren’t quite sure what social change they had actually accomplished. Once we realized that we did not know exactly what impact we were having, we knew we had to change.

I have always liked the quote from Maya Angelou: “Now that I know better, I do better.” The foundation had to do things differently — not because we had been wrong in the past, but because we knew that there was a real opportunity to create a bigger impact moving forward.

As a start, instead of considering every proposal that came to our doorstep, we decided to narrow our focus areas and zero in on a pressing need in the communities we serve. For us, the answer was K-12 public education: an area of critical need today that also harkened to our family foundation’s values and historical giving. After several years of learning through this approach, we narrowed our mission again to focus on two issues with compelling evidence of affecting student success: the quality of teachers and leaders and a solid base of achievement by the third grade. This did not mean that other issues in our community were not as important; rather, it meant that with issues so large and complex, we had to focus in on areas where we felt our grant-making could garner the most traction given our limited resources.

Next, we discovered that our funding alone just was not enough to affect real change. We had overlooked two particularly powerful tools: advocacy and coalition-building. In the past, we had never thought about using our own voice as a foundation to further our mission. We shied away from attention or public statements. Looking back on it now, I realize what a missed opportunity that approach was. Recently, the foundation has slowly stepped out and taken a few risks in using our voice. We have worked to showcase new ways of creating teacher career pathways in North Carolina. In early grade achievement, we have helped to spearhead a coalition of leaders working to increase summer learning opportunities as well as a group of leaders pushing to improve third grade reading proficiency. Partnerships have sharpened our ideas, forced us to consider new ways of approaching problems, and magnified our impact in education.

Nothing was wrong about the way our family foundation had worked in the past. It was doing good, but the opportunity to do even more was too compelling to overlook. We needed to hone our mission, focus in the key areas where we could have the deepest impact, and multiply our work by engaging with others. Change was a risk for us. But taking that risk has led to smarter investments, ones that have potential to change a system, rather than only affecting one program or child.

We had to leave behind the comfortable in order to create positive change and deeper social impact. The process is not over; our search for more impact continues. But every day, we focus our energy on building upon what is good.

These themes will be addressed in more detail through the Pioneers for Change Fellowship kicking off on March 23 and 24, 2015 in London. Pioneers for Change is an initiative of Adessy Associates.

About Katie Belk Morris
Katie B. Morris serves as board chair of The Belk Foundation, a family foundation based in Charlotte, N.C. Under her leadership, the organization has redefined its mission to focus on providing quality education for children and youth, hired full-time professional staff and increased community accessibility and awareness of The Foundation. She also serves as a trustee of The John M. Belk Endowment, which focuses on post-secondary degree obtainment for under-served populations.

KAKI BENNETT ’15 DOES DAVIDSON RESEARCH INITIATIVE RESEARCH ON E-CIGARETTES

If You Put Something Else in Your Pipe and Smoke It, Are You Safer?

September 10, 2014 by Robert Abare ’13

Kaki Bennett '15 in E-cigs homepage article 9-10-14Kaki Bennett ’15 works with Associate Professor Karen Bernd to determine whether e-cig vapor is as benign as proponents claim.

The dangers of smoking cigarettes are widely known. But what do most people believe about about up-and-coming alternatives-electronic cigarettes and hookah-which are often touted as safer and less harmful? Two teams of student researchers at Davidson College have been working with faculty mentors to shed some light on these smoking devices for the benefit of both the scientific community and the public.

Kaki Bennett ’15 has been researching e-cigarettes through a Davidson Research Initiative (DRI) grant with Associate Professor of Biology Karen Bernd, a longtime researcher of environmental pollutants.

Meanwhile, Robert Hagerty ’15 and Vishal Mehta ’15, another DRI student, are studying the chemical composition of hookah and its varying components with Associate Professor of Chemistry and Chair of Environmental Studies Cindy Hauser. Hauser, an expert in particle chemistry, has been conducting hookah studies for three years.

Exposing E-Cigs

Bennett originally told Bernd that she wanted to study the effects of cigarette smoke, but then discovered the burgeoning market of e-cigs. “At first, no one seemed to know what e-cigs were or where to find them,” Bennett explained. “Then they quickly became popular. I suddenly started finding them in magazine advertisements and on the shelf in grocery stores and gas stations.”

Unlike a traditional cigarette, which creates smoke through the process of combustion, an e-cig uses a battery-powered heat coil to vaporize a flavored liquid that contains nicotine. Because e-cigs produce vapor rather than smoke, users refer to themselves as “vapers” and their activity as “vaping.” The unique way e-cigs convert a liquid into a gas leads many makers of e-cigs to claim the product is safer than conventional cigarettes.

Bennett decided to put those claims to the test in the lab by exposing rat lung cells to e-cig vapor and observing how it affects the cells. She places the cells, grown in small plastic trays, inside exposure chambers that she fills with e-cig vapor. To determine the appropriate levels of vapor for exposure, Bernd and Bennett use standards set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) for researchers studying conventional cigarettes. They can’t use ISO standards for e-cigs simply because ISO standards for e-cigs have not been determined.

Hookah Who’s Who

Hauser has been involved in the study of hookah for the past three years in collaboration with former student researchers Joe Cline ’11, Mac Gilliland ’12, Tim Oh ’13 and Jessica Annonio ’14. Current students Robert Hagerty ’15 and Vishal Mehta ’15 are continuing the work.

A hookah, also called a water pipe, is a vase-like smoking device. The user places a hot charcoal brick over a bowl filled with a syrupy tobacco mixture called “shisha.” The brick and mixture are separated by a fine conductive mesh so that the two ingredients don’t touch.

When the smoker sucks on a tube attached to the hookah, the hot charcoal causes the shisha to smoke. The smoke travels into the hookah’s water jar, where it passes through water or another liquid such as wine or orange juice. The smoke that passes through the liquid is then inhaled by the smoker.

Vendors and users of hookah often claim that the device is less harmful than conventional smoking because hookah smoke is filtered through water. Furthermore, the shisha does not undergo direct combustion like cigarette tobacco, but is instead heated indirectly by the charcoal brick.

Hauser noted, however, that the charcoal contains many of the same dangerous chemicals as cigarette smoke, including carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). To focus Hagerty’s and Mehta’s research solely on the chemical composition of the shisha and the smoke it produces, Hauser decided to replace the charcoal with a ceramic heating plate.

A Safer System?

Hauser has found that attendees at research presentations sometimes believe that replacing the charcoal brick with the heating plate creates a safe system. Hauser disabuses them of that notion. “I remind those learning about our project that our goal is not to find a safer way to smoke a hookah,” Hauser said. “There is no safe way to smoke a hookah.”

Mehta and Hagerty are specifically studying the chemical composition of hookah smoke, the shisha, and the contents of the water jar. Hagerty is researching the presence of metals, like copper and nickel, while Mehta is analyzing the presence of pyrazines-potentially harmful molecules of carbon, nitrogen and hydrogen.

Hauser steered the two students toward the direction of their study after hearing from public health researchers at a hookah research conference in Abu Dhabi. Researchers in attendance said they needed more information on the metal and pyrazine content of hookah smoke to determine the degree to which it presents a health hazard.

Given that interest, Hagerty’s and Mehta’s projects may play significant roles in informing the scientific and public health community of the extent of the dangers posed by smoking hookah.

To analyze metals in the hookah smoke, Hagerty uses a pump to pull smoke from the hookah and send it through a filter. He then digests the filters with nitric acid, which leaves the metals behind. Hagerty processes the metals using a flame atomic absorption spectrometer (FAAS). The FAAS ignites the metals, and an electronic eye in the FAAS records changes in the flame’s color. The color change correlates to the types of metal present.

Mehta uses a similar process called solid phase micro extraction (SPME) to collect pyrazines in the shisha. He uses a fiber coated with compounds to absorb particles dislodged from the shisha, and then inserts the fiber into a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer (GCMS) which detects the compounds on the fiber. The results of the GCMS allow Mehta to map out the pyrazine content of the shisha.

A Healthier Body of Knowledge

E-cigs and hookah are similar in that they are often promoted to consumers as “less dangerous” alternatives to conventional cigarettes. In fact, e-cigarettes originated as smoking cessation devices.

The safety claims were one reason Hauser began her hookah research. “Hookah is often marketed as a less risky form of smoking because the smoke is filtered through water,” she said. “I was initially intrigued because I didn’t think of water as a good filter.”

Indeed, Hauser’s students are finding that hookah’s reputation as a better smoking option may not be credible. Hagerty’s results from the FAAS have revealed the presence of nickel, copper, magnesium and chromium in the hookah smoke-all of which have the potential to cause significant harm if inhaled in large quantities.

It remains to be seen, however, exactly how hookah and e-cigs compare to conventional cigarettes. The Davidson research projects are not intended to compare alternative smoking devices to the effects or chemical composition of cigarettes.

“We aren’t trying to cure all ills, but rather lay the groundwork so that other researchers can use our results as a measuring stick,” said Bernd. “The best thing that can happen in research is that the questions you ask lead to more questions.”

Hauser also hopes that the hookah research may help public health officials make more informed decisions. “We are asking targeted questions to help the health community determine the best policies and regulations for the public’s safety,” she said.

Second Hand Science

Both the hookah and e-cig researchers are glad that their projects are attracting interest both inside and outside academia. Hauser praised her students for their willingness to become ambassadors for their scientific research. “Both Robert and Vishal are eager to discuss their projects with those who’d like to learn more,” she said.

Likewise, Bennett’s e-cig project has attracted interest. “I love my project because it starts conversations,” she said. “I presented on e-cigs at a conference in April, and people came up to me afterward to talk about their friends or family who smoke e-cigs. Everyone knows someone who smokes, either with e-cigs or regular cigarettes.”

Bennett has become so familiar with e-cigs through her research she’s now spotted wearing them in her hair to hold her bun in place. But, as cozy as Bennett may be with the devices, Bernd pointed out, “She hasn’t once tried smoking one!”